BIENNALE UNVEILED: GLOBAL EXHIBITION AND COMMERCE OPPORTUNITIES.

Art fairs and biennials inhabit the same artistic universe but serve distinct purposes. The former primarily functions as commercial hubs where artworks are bought and sold, whereas biennials act as global stages, celebrating the rich diversity of contemporary art.

May 03, 2024
BIENNALE UNVEILED: GLOBAL EXHIBITION AND COMMERCE OPPORTUNITIES.

Since its inception in 1895, the Venice Biennale has been a trailblazer for such events, initially spotlighting European art but gradually incorporating diverse artistic voices from across the globe and reaching a peak this edition with a significant presence of artists from the global south. Titled “Stranieri ovunque - Foreigners everywhere,” this Biennale host a total of 331 artists with connections to at least 69 countries, the event illustrates the complex interplay of national identities within the art world. Here, artists' nationalities often defy simple categorization, as many were born in one country but either passed away or currently reside in another. This edition stands out as the first curated by a Latin American, featuring a remarkable ensemble of 85 artists from the region—comprising 28 living and 57 late artists. Their affiliations span 16 countries throughout Latin America and the Caribbean, highlighting the profound impact this region has on the artistic landscape.

On top of the artists exhibited across the Giardini and the Arsenale, the city is also alive with numerous collateral events and exhibitions, further cementing Venice status as a pivotal gathering in the international art scene. Biennials are not merely art shows but festivals of creativity, offering an immersive experience through a blend of large-scale installations, video art, forums, and live performances. They serve as cultural landmarks and economic catalysts, bolstered by local government support, enhancing their host cities' prestige and economic vitality. However, while biennials typically convey an air of cultural exhibition over commerce, it's insightful to remember that when the Venice Biennale was created in 1895, one of the intentions was to promote contemporary art and enable artists to financially benefit from their creative output. Until the tumultuous year of 1968, when the spirit of student protests led to a reevaluation, the Biennale featured a sales office.

 

Today, even though biennials are not openly commercial by design, they invariably involve the discreet financial backing of art dealers. This patronage is essential for the creation, transport, and display of significant artworks, and on occasion, transactions unfold quietly. A notable instance occurred in 2015 when François Pinault discreetly acquired eight large canvases by Georg Baselitz, totaling $8.9 million, during the Venice showcase, hinting at the subtle yet undeniable commerce that operates within these events. The current edition witnesses this subtle interplay of art and commerce once more, as the Venice Biennale and Art Basel open their doors in close succession. This calendar coincidence turns Venice into a prelude for the art world's elite, with many collectors embarking from Venice to Basel. It's a choreographed dance of art, with galleries often presenting in Basel the same artists they celebrated in Venice, a testament to the enduring symbiosis between cultural exhibitions and the art market.

The honor of being selected to represent one's country at the Venice Biennale carries considerable weight. It not only bestows a mark of distinction upon an artist but also elevates their career by amplifying their prestige, enhancing their visibility, and notably, by potentially increasing the value of their work in the market. This is particularly true for artists who have the backing of savvy and influential galleries.

 

However, the financial hurdles of exhibiting at the Venice Biennale can be formidable, particularly for artists showcasing multiple works. To illustrate, let’s look at how the financial commitment for the U.S. representation has soared. Robert Rauschenberg's participation in 1964 required a budget that, adjusted for inflation, would approximate $720,000 today. Fast forward to 2022, and Simone Leigh’s display commanded a staggering $7 million. This escalation underscores a growing reliance on funds from collectors and galleries, as government contributions fail to keep pace with inflating costs. This fundraising necessity has become an integral part of the event’s logistics, but it's not without controversy. It raises concerns about the accessibility of the biennale, as only those artists with influential backers capable of shouldering such steep financial burdens can afford to exhibit. This dynamic also poses ethical questions about the art market's influence on what is ostensibly a cultural event.

Simone Leigh's 2022 appearance, for instance, was underwritten by the prominent gallery Hauser & Wirth, continuing a pattern observed when they supported Mark Bradford in 2017. The current U.S. Pavilion, showcasing Jeffrey Gibson’s work—an artist of Mississippi Choctaw and Cherokee heritage represented by an array of galleries—required a budget of $5.8 million, with a meager 7.5% coming from government coffers. Bridging this financial gap necessitated a concerted effort by curators, galleries, and philanthropists, who managed to secure substantial contributions from foundations and through innovative fundraising methods, including the sale of limited-edition luxury blankets at Sotheby’s. Simultaneously, Christie’s is supporting the Nigerian pavilion as well as partly funding the British pavilion who also benefits from support from the Frieze art fair. So, we have galleries, art fairs and auction houses all financing Biennale events.  Undoubtedly, galleries will seek to offset their expenditures through increased sales and higher pricing strategies. For auction houses, events like these serve as ideal occasions to cultivate client relationships. As for Frieze, while less explicit, it's probable that their aim also includes attracting a network of galleries and collectors.

 

In fact, the Venice Biennale, despite its non-commercial veneer, has long been understood as a marketplace where artworks, eventually, are sold. This tacit understanding was made manifest in labels that, up until 2019, credited the artist's representative gallery—a discreet nod to potential buyers. Although this practice has since ceased, those keen on acquisition can easily unearth the necessary information with a simple online search.

Commercial aspects aside, an artist's feature at the Venice Biennale often marks a significant milestone in their career. The long-running exhibition garners international attention, bringing unnoticed artists to the forefront of the global art scene. This visibility often translates into business opportunities. Galleries have their own approach, but for artists, the Biennale can lead to increased demand and higher prices for their works. But the Biennale isn't just a marketplace; it's a launchpad for future success. When work connects with an audience, it can lead to larger exhibitions and major acquisitions, cementing an artist's status in the market. Take Jeffrey Gibson, for example: after his Biennale selection, he earned a prestigious commission from the Metropolitan Museum of Art. This is the kind of impact the Venice Biennale can have.

Related Topics

eZ debug

Timing: Jan 28 2026 15:59:32
Script start
Timing: Jan 28 2026 15:59:32
Module start 'content'
Timing: Jan 28 2026 15:59:33
Module end 'content'
Notice: PHP: E_NOTICE Jan 28 2026 15:59:33
Array to string conversion in /var/www/sites/cms4/ez-2013.09/var/artealdia_com/cache/template/compiled/page_head-41456490553c6342610ca0a1b2d2cc7c.php on line 939
Timing: Jan 28 2026 15:59:33
Script end

Main resources:

Total runtime0.7337 sec
Peak memory usage7,680.0000 KB
Database Queries462

Timing points:

CheckpointStart (sec)Duration (sec)Memory at start (KB)Memory used (KB)
Script start 0.00000.0080 915.5781607.4297
Module start 'content' 0.00810.6648 1,523.00784,946.5625
Module end 'content' 0.67280.0608 6,469.5703402.9375
Script end 0.7336  6,872.5078 

Time accumulators:

 Accumulator Duration (sec) Duration (%) Count Average (sec)
Ini load
Load cache0.00240.3312160.0002
Mysql Total
Database connection0.00150.210210.0015
Mysqli_queries0.290939.65494620.0006
Looping result0.00560.76324610.0000
TS translator
TS init0.00140.189830.0005
TS cache load0.00100.140130.0003
TS context load0.00090.119730.0003
Template Total0.690694.120.3453
Template load0.00180.242920.0009
Template processing0.688893.886520.3444
Template load and register function0.00010.013910.0001
states
state_id_array0.01161.5827240.0005
state_identifier_array0.01241.6857250.0005
Override
Cache load0.00220.29521410.0000
Sytem overhead
Fetch class attribute can translate value0.00220.3031390.0001
Fetch class attribute name0.00350.4823450.0001
XML
Image XML parsing0.166922.7426390.0043
class_abstraction
Instantiating content class attribute0.00030.0405590.0000
General
dbfile0.172223.47081530.0011
String conversion0.00000.001420.0000
Note: percentages do not add up to 100% because some accumulators overlap

Time used to render debug report: 0.0003 secs