De Nature en Sculpture. Fundación Villa Datris. L'Isle-Sur-La Sorgue, Francia

The exhibition De Nature en Sculpture shows how nature is perceived by contemporary artists—mainly, as source of inspiration and means of expression. Nature, whether reproduced or in its actual state, is, here, turned into sculpture, and vice versa. Engaging our emotions, the artists summon nature in all of its forms and reveal through their visions its many facets (peaceful, turbulent, sublime, and vexing).

October 18, 2017
Michel BLAZY, I Bookgarden, 2014. © Daniel Avena

With garden stretched along the Sorgue River, the Villa Datris Fondation exists in a state of harmony with water, vegetation, wind, and southern light. Indeed, that tie to the natural environment is a pillar of the foundation’s identity while also posing a challenge for artists. The exhibition De Nature en Sculpture shows how nature is perceived by contemporary artists—mainly, as source of inspiration and means of expression. Nature, whether reproduced or in its actual state, is, here, turned into sculpture, and vice versa. Engaging our emotions, the artists summon nature in all of its forms and reveal through their visions its many facets (peaceful, turbulent, sublime, and vexing).

Though man has, for centuries, cultivated and organized nature, the earth has expressed its wrath. Sensitive to the environment, some artists seek out nature with in situ interventions in works of Land Art, for instance, which continues to influence contemporary artists like Mireille Fulpius—her installation in Villa Datris’s garden attests to that movement’s enduring power.

Artists are renewing their understanding of natural beauty. If some, like Eva Jospin, are interested in personalizing it, others, like Anne Mangeot, Daniel Dezeuze and Moffat Takadiwa, create works from materials gathered during their travels or inspired by the savoir-faire of ancient and traditional cultures.

Thanks to advances in biology, the structure of nature and its components can be represented. By revealing things invisible, like DNA, science alters our perception. In the eighties, artists appropriated those discoveries: Elias Crespín and Manuel Merida, for instance, used technology to simulate nature’s movements.

Drawn to the idea of creating artificial nature, man uses science and technology; some artists explore the endless possibilities of their artifacts. Michel Blazy acts as a researcher. He gives industrial objects rendered obsolete new life by planting vegetables in their cracks, thus re-conquering them in comic fashion.

For some artists, imagining the future is a way to question the present and modern civilization.

Going beyond the divide between the natural and the artificial, they take us into a future of science fiction. Laurent Pernot would freeze cactus; in Carlos Medina’s world, rain is made of metal; Françoise Coutant suggests that we take a cloud out for a walk. In this universe of fiction, anything is possible!

Since antiquity, artists’ primary concern has been imitating nature—its beauty and power. That fascination has taken a number of forms of representation. From the Garden of Eden in our imagination to environmental disasters, our vision of nature changes constantly. Nature today questions humankind as a whole, but especially artists, observers of a universe as alive as it is vulnerable. Before these mysteries and metamorphoses, artists set out to reinvent the nature of tomorrow. And, more than anything else, our actions today are responsible for its transformation, whether for good or for bad.

eZ debug

Timing: Jan 22 2026 15:39:31
Script start
Timing: Jan 22 2026 15:39:31
Module start 'content'
Timing: Jan 22 2026 15:39:32
Module end 'content'
Notice: PHP: E_NOTICE Jan 22 2026 15:39:32
Array to string conversion in /var/www/sites/cms4/ez-2013.09/var/artealdia_com/cache/template/compiled/page_head-41456490553c6342610ca0a1b2d2cc7c.php on line 939
Timing: Jan 22 2026 15:39:32
Script end

Main resources:

Total runtime0.3038 sec
Peak memory usage5,376.0000 KB
Database Queries138

Timing points:

CheckpointStart (sec)Duration (sec)Memory at start (KB)Memory used (KB)
Script start 0.00000.0135 914.0859607.4688
Module start 'content' 0.01350.2170 1,521.55472,965.0391
Module end 'content' 0.23050.0732 4,486.5938369.0391
Script end 0.3037  4,855.6328 

Time accumulators:

 Accumulator Duration (sec) Duration (%) Count Average (sec)
Ini load
Load cache0.01765.8055160.0011
Mysql Total
Database connection0.00170.548110.0017
Mysqli_queries0.088229.03891380.0006
Looping result0.00220.71891350.0000
TS translator
TS init0.01143.766030.0038
TS cache load0.00421.388930.0014
TS context load0.00391.291130.0013
Template Total0.238578.520.1192
Template load0.01053.455320.0052
Template processing0.228075.044820.1140
Template load and register function0.00040.121510.0004
states
state_id_array0.00220.734670.0003
state_identifier_array0.00341.118980.0004
Override
Cache load0.00591.9578270.0002
Sytem overhead
Fetch class attribute can translate value0.00130.419290.0001
Fetch class attribute name0.00311.0276120.0003
XML
Image XML parsing0.052517.290190.0058
class_abstraction
Instantiating content class attribute0.00010.0211120.0000
General
dbfile0.062920.7117610.0010
String conversion0.00000.003920.0000
Note: percentages do not add up to 100% because some accumulators overlap

Time used to render debug report: 0.0003 secs